Melilac
Далучыўся 20 красавіка 2013
Змесціва выдалена Змесціва дададзена
→Hair Peace Salon: абнаўленне звестак |
|||
Радок 17:
'''P.S.''' Я лічу, што гэта ў тым ліку і персанальны «напад». Справу распачаў «юзэр» [[Удзельнік:Cabayi|Cabayi]]. Пару дзён таму ён паставіў на выдаленне распрацаваны мною на месяц [[Азія|Азіі]] (лістапад 2018) англамоўны артыкул пра [[Кірстэн Німвэй]], бо «няма камерцыйных выдавецтваў для тых з паўтузіна раманаў», які ўмомант выдаліў другі адмін. Я адразу ў размовах адпісаў [[Удзельнік:Cabayi|Cabayi]], што "колькі камерцыйных выдавецтваў кніг можна прыцягнуць, калі пісаць мастацкую літаратуру на [[Тагальская мова|тагальскай мове]], калі гэта не пераклад [[Біблія|Бібіліі]] альбо падручнік для школы, на друк якога грошы дае ўрад"? [[Тагальская мова]] на [[Філіпіны|Філіпінах]], як беларуская, мае праблемы з ужываннем: паўсюль [[Англійская мова|англійская]], а свая ў большасці ў вусным ужытку яшчэ трошкі захоўваецца ад бацькоў і дзядоў. Ён не адказаў у размовах, пачаў «дурыцца». Зараз буду спрачацца і спрабаваць выратаваць артыкул са сметніка на агульных пачатках. (*´Д｀*)
:I personally prefer not to deal with english wikipedia as they have lots of coworkers, but it is a rule, not law so it has exceptions, so I wrote down my opinnion on why it should not be deleted. Still, in my opinion (and I was not the only one who thought like that) the article in english was a bit too detailed as it's impacts, people in it etc. were too detailed for a foreign culture room (at least for a moment). As my main working space is estonian wikipedia where I have lots of experience of balancing the possible and the necessary information so that the focus would move towards the more thorough articles while keeping it readable I would say current form is too over-detailed (and over-referenced), which would make such attacks possible. - [[Удзельнік:Melilac|Melilac]] ([[Размовы з удзельнікам:Melilac|размовы]]) 09:56, 8 снежня 2018 (MSK)
T e r e, Melilac! ^^ Дзякуй, што адпісаў! (✿◕‿◕)
That "threesome" ("court" à la https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NKVD_troika) there (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hair_Peace_Salon) is going to end its session in a day or two, so each remark is worth. The score right now is 1:1... ⁎⁍̴̆＿⁍̴̆⁎
What it comes to personal things, assessing such matters in the way was proposed to do may lead to fast deletion of the entirely scope of Belarusian bands pages mentioned here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_music_in_Belarus), because over 90% of these articles barely have several high profile references, while diverse written facts even in the most delicate made one about Krambambula shall to be proven with some kind of refs, at the end of the day. It's hard to do it, going back to the 90s and the 00s, when Internet in Belarus was weak(
It is double strange one case, why they got objected [[Hair Peace Salon]], while an article of this sort about the Bristeil band (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristeil) is live without sending away for the 4th year. That band has only 1 EP, 1 video, and no shows in comparison to its rich background from the HPS times.
Now they are talking more about references, shifted from the notability issue was being originally raised to chiming in, why that area is rational to discuss on the talk page of the article itself, as well as to figure out ways to streamline the article presentation and reading experience( - [[Удзельнік:pr12402|pr12402]]
| |||